A free pack of Claude skills for people writing resumes, cover letters, and portfolios with AI. It polishes your drafts, flags the phrases that read as machine-written, and refuses to quietly inflate a single claim.
This pack came out of a real revision session. While refining a resume and portfolio with AI, small edits kept creeping in: a claim about independent work drifted toward something that sounded like founding a program, and plain headers turned into generic filler that could have belonged to anyone.
Nobody approved those changes. They just accumulated.
neon-jetpack assumes you are doing the healthy thing, collaborating with Claude on your own writing. Its job is to make sure the result still says what you meant, claims only what is true, and sounds like you on your best day rather than a template on its average one.
Agentic workflows
One signal. The crew runs it.
These are not one-shot prompts. A dispatcher skill routes your request to the right specialists, in the right order, with a sign-off gate before anything changes.
Ship a cover letter
A letter that reads like you on a good day, checked for inflation before it reaches a hiring manager.
line-editcleans grammar, wordiness, and awkward sentences
full-reviewruns six passes: AI tells, tone, honesty, register, facts
You sign off on a diff table before anything changes
Why this order: line-edit is a light polish that never touches tone, so it goes first on a rough draft. Full-review already includes the AI-tells and tone checks, so you never run those separately. One clean pass, one deep pass, done.
Say this to Claude
Line-edit this cover letter draft, then run a full review before I send it to a hiring manager.
Portfolio page going live
A page reviewed for structure first and words second, so your copy edits survive.
ux-web-design-reviewaudits hierarchy, readability, and trust, with every claim cited
You fix the structural issues it finds
full-reviewthen works over the final copy in place
Why this order: if the UX pass tells you to cut a section or reorder the page, any copy edits you made earlier are wasted. Structure first, words second. The reverse order costs you a rewrite.
Say this to Claude
This portfolio page is about to go live. Run a UX review of the page first, then a full review of the copy once the structure is settled.
The quick “does this sound like AI?” pass
Every mechanical tell flagged, each with a concrete rewrite. Five minutes, no ceremony.
ai-written-checkscans for em dashes, triple lists, engineered cadence, and the rest
That is it. One skill, one pass.
There is no chain here, and that is the point. A focused check is faster than the full treatment. But know the limit: this pass catches how the writing sounds, not whether it overclaims. When the reader is a hiring manager, ask for a full review instead.
Say this to Claude
Run an AI-written check on this LinkedIn post. Just the tells, nothing deeper.
Release your creative work
Finished copy plus a plain-English walkthrough of US copyright basics before you hit publish.
line-editorfull-review, whichever your draft needs
You sign off on the final text
copyright-creative-workcovers registration, notice, and licensing questions
Why this order: the copyright pass is educational and assumes the work is final. Run it after the copy is locked, so the answers apply to what you actually publish. It is a primer, not legal advice, and the skill says so up front.
Say this to Claude
Review this artist statement for my photo series, then walk me through the copyright basics before I publish it.
The crew
Seven specialists and a dispatcher.
line-edit
Light-touch sentence polish: grammar, clarity, wordiness. Hands back a clean version plus the judgment calls you can overrule. Never a rewrite.
“Polish this email.”
ai-written-check
Flags the mechanical tells of machine writing, from em dashes to engineered cadence, each with a concrete rewrite.
“Does this sound like AI?”
cringe-check
Audits tone and positioning: solo-hero framing, parroting the job description, overclaiming authority.
“Does this sound cocky?”
full-review
The orchestrator for high-stakes copy. Six passes, a before/after diff table, and nothing changes until you sign off.
“Review my cover letter.”
ux-web-design-review
Reviews your portfolio page against cited UX research, separating what works for readers from what is merely in fashion.
“Review my site’s UX.”
copyright-creative-work
US copyright basics for your own creative work: registration prep, split sheets, what to do before you publish. Educational, not legal advice.
“How do I protect this before I post it?”
journey-map
Bonus
The odd one out. The rest of the pack sharpens what you write and how you show it. This one builds a research artifact, a milestone-based journey map from interviews and funnel data. It still plays by the pack’s rule: every claim source-tagged or loudly marked ASSUMED, nothing inflated. Reach for it when a portfolio needs the work behind the work. Builds in FigJam when Figma is connected, or as a portable markdown matrix.
“Map the journey from signup to renewal.”
The contract
Four rules every skill obeys.
Sign-off firstFindings are presented before anything is rewritten. Your words change only when you approve the change.
Never inflateIf an edit would make a claim bigger than the stated truth, the skill stops and asks instead of polishing the inflation into a fact.
Preserve voiceA rough, specific sentence beats a smooth, generic one. These skills subtract noise; they do not add polish-paste.
Report the gapsEvery review ends by naming which passes ran and which did not, so “reviewed” never overstates coverage.
Free, MIT-licensed
Install in one command.
In Claude Code, add the marketplace and install the pack:
Prefer just one skill? Each folder under skills/ stands alone. Copy it into ~/.claude/skills/, or upload it as a skill on claude.ai. full-review falls back to built-in notes if the focused checks are not installed.